Antimicrobial use on italian pig farms and its relationship with husbandry practices

22Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The analysis of antimicrobial use (AMU) data in livestock allows for the identification of risk factors for AMU, thereby favoring the application of responsible AMU policies on-farm. Herewith, AMU in 36 finishing pig farms in northern Italy from 2015–2017 was expressed as defined daily doses for Italian pigs (DDDita) per population correction unit (DDDita/100kg). A retrospective analysis was then conducted to determine the effects of several husbandry practices on AMU. Overall, AMU ranged between 12 DDDita/100kg in 2015 and 8 DDDita/100kg in 2017, showing no significant trends, due to the large variability in AMU between farms. However, a 66% AMU reduction was observed in 19 farms during 2015-2017. Farm size, number of farm workers, air quality, average pig mortality, and presence of undocked pigs on the farm had no significant effects on AMU. Rather, welfare-friendly farms had 38% lower AMU levels (p < 0.05). In conclusion, animal welfare management seems to be relatively more important than farm structure and other managerial characteristics as drivers of AMU in finishing pig farms.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tarakdjian, J., Capello, K., Pasqualin, D., Santini, A., Cunial, G., Scollo, A., … Di Martino, G. (2020). Antimicrobial use on italian pig farms and its relationship with husbandry practices. Animals, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030417

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free