Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being?

1.1kCitations
Citations of this article
1.9kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The present study investigated in a sample of 587 telecom managers whether workaholism, burnout, and work engagement - the supposed antipode of burnout - can be distinguished empirically. These three concepts were measured with existing, validated multi-dimensional questionnaires. Structural equation modeling revealed that a slightly modified version of the hypothesised model that assumed three distinct yet correlated constructs - burnout, engagement, and workaholism - fitted the data best. Multiple regression analyses revealed that these three concepts retained unique hypothesised patterns of relationships with variables from five clusters representing (1) long working hours, (2) job characteristics, (3) work outcomes, (4) quality of social relationships, and (5) perceived health, respectively. In sum, our analyses provided converging evidence that workaholism, burnout, and engagement are three different kinds of employee well-being rather than three of a kind. © 2007 International Association of Applied Psychology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Van Rhenen, W. (2008). Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Applied Psychology, 57(2), 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00285.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free