Estimating the critical duration for temporal summation of standard achromatic perimetric stimuli

11Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose. To estimate the critical duration of temporal summation for achromatic Goldmann III stimuli under the conditions of standard automated perimetry (SAP) and quantify response variability for short-duration stimuli. Methods. Contrast thresholds were gathered using the method of constant stimuli for seven circular (0.48° diameter) incremental stimuli of varying duration (sum-of-frames equivalent: 8.3–198.3 ms), at an eccentricity of 8.8° along the four principal meridians of the visual field in two healthy, psychophysically experienced observers. Stimuli were presented on a highresolution cathode ray tube display with a background luminance of 10 cd/m2. Psychometric functions were fitted using a probit model and nonparametric local-linear analysis. The critical duration was estimated using iterative two-phase regression analysis, the results also being compared with values produced using previously published methods of analysis. Results. The median critical duration estimated using iterative two-phase regression analysis was 27.7 ms (IQR 22.5–29.8). A slight steepening of the psychometric function slope (lower variability) was observed for longer stimulus durations, using both probit and local-linear analysis techniques, but this was not statistically significant. Conclusions:. Critical duration estimates in this study are substantially shorter than those previously reported for a Goldmann III stimulus, under the conditions of SAP. Further work is required to firmly establish the relationship between measurement variability and the degree of local temporal and spatial summation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mulholland, P. J., Redmond, T., Garway-Heath, D. F., Anderson, R. S., & Anderson, R. S. (2015). Estimating the critical duration for temporal summation of standard achromatic perimetric stimuli. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 56(1), 431–437. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-15304

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free