A qualitative study to identify factors influencing COXIB prescribed by family physicians for musculoskeletal disorders

8Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction. Cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibiting (COXIB) anti-inflammatories have been the drug class prescribed for a large number of cases of musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders in Canada over the past 5 years. The Alberta Improvements for MSK Disorders (AIMS) initiative sought to better understand the COXIB prescribing situation by funding several studies. The objective of this qualitative study was to determine the factors underlying primary care physicians' medication prescribing behaviour during an office visit for an MSK disorder, with particular emphasis on the prescribing of COXIBs. Methods. The target respondents were Alberta primary care physicians chosen from a stratified random sample to meet a wide range of characteristics. Individual, semi-structured interviews were used to assess decision pathways in four real cases chosen by the physician. A total of 19 interviews were conducted and analysed using an analytic inductive approach. Results. Factors judged as being important to decision pathways in relation to COXIB prescribing for MSK disease included safety, patient characteristics, affordability to patients, availability of samples, drug company marketing practices, habit formation, time contstraints, previous clinical experience of doctors and/or patient with certain drugs and doctors' perception of absolute versus relative risk. Interpretation. Most physicians preferentially prescribed COXIBs subsequent to a complicated, multifactorial, but essentially patient-centred, decision-making process. © The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klein, D., MacDonald, A., Drummon, N., & Cave, A. (2006). A qualitative study to identify factors influencing COXIB prescribed by family physicians for musculoskeletal disorders. Family Practice, 23(6), 659–665. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cml048

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free