Conscientious objection to intentional killing: An argument for toleration 18 Law and Legal Studies 1801 Law 22 Philosophy and Religious Studies 2203 Philosophy 16 Studies in Human Society 1606 Political Science

15Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In the debate on conscientious objection in healthcare, proponents of conscience rights often point to the imperative to protect the health professional's moral integrity. Their opponents hold that the moral integrity argument alone can at most justify accommodation of conscientious objectors as a "moral courtesy", as the argument is insufficient to establish a general moral right to accommodation, let alone a legal right. Main text: This text draws on political philosophy in order to argue for a legal right to accommodation. The moral integrity arguments should be supplemented by the requirement to protect minority rights in liberal democracies. Citizens have a right to live in accordance with their fundamental moral convictions, and a right to equal access to employment. However, this right should not be unconditional, as that would unduly infringe on the rights of other citizens. The right must be limited to cases where the moral basis is more fundamental in a sense that all reasonable citizens in a liberal democracy should accept, such as the constitutive role of the inviolability of human life in liberal democracies. Conclusion: There should be a legal, yet circumscribed, right to accommodation for conscientious objectors refusing to provide healthcare services that they reasonably consider to involve the intentional killing of a human being.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Myskja, B. K., & Magelssen, M. (2018, October 19). Conscientious objection to intentional killing: An argument for toleration 18 Law and Legal Studies 1801 Law 22 Philosophy and Religious Studies 2203 Philosophy 16 Studies in Human Society 1606 Political Science. BMC Medical Ethics. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0323-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free