From "Gay Marriage Controversy" (2004) to "Endorsement of Same-Sex Marriage" (2012): Framing Bisexuality in the Marriage Equality Discourse

48Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The current study analyzes the evolution of language used to discuss marriage equality in The New York Times between February and May 2004 and February and May 2012. Specifically, the study examines how sexual orientation labels were used as modifiers for "marriage," "couples," and "individuals." Results indicate that the language evolved from a focus on the sexual orientation label gay in 2004 to a more inclusive language, with same-sex as the predominant modifier for marriage and couples in 2012. Further, while the overall language in The New York Times became more inclusive of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender community at large, bisexual women and men are still largely absent within the marriage equality discourse. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hackl, A. M., Boyer, C. R., & Galupo, M. P. (2013). From “Gay Marriage Controversy” (2004) to “Endorsement of Same-Sex Marriage” (2012): Framing Bisexuality in the Marriage Equality Discourse. Sexuality and Culture, 17(3), 512–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-012-9159-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free