Computer-vision-guided human pulse rate estimation: A review

57Citations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Human pulse rate (PR) can be estimated in several ways, including measurement instruments that directly count the PR through contact- and noncontact-based approaches. Over the last decade, computer-vision-assisted noncontact-based PR estimation has evolved significantly. Such techniques can be adopted for clinical purposes to mitigate some of the limitations of contact-based techniques. However, existing vision-guided noncontact-based techniques have not been benchmarked with respect to a challenging dataset. In view of this, we present a systematic review of such techniques implemented over a uniform computing platform. We have simultaneously recorded the PR and video of 14 volunteers. Five sets of data have been recorded for every volunteer using five different experimental conditions by varying the distance from the camera and illumination condition. Pros and cons of the existing noncontact image- and video-based PR techniques have been discussed with respect to our dataset. Experimental evaluation suggests that image- or video-based PR estimation can be highly effective for nonclinical purposes, and some of these approaches are very promising toward developing clinical applications. The present review is the first in this field of contactless vision-guided PR estimation research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sikdar, A., Behera, S. K., & Dogra, D. P. (2016). Computer-vision-guided human pulse rate estimation: A review. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2016.2551778

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free