Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis: The First Year of Brazilian Experience

49Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate mechanical and infectious complications associated with urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) and patients and technique survival in the first 180 days. Methods: It was a prospective study that evaluated chronic patients who started unplanned PD using high-volume PD (HVPD) right after (<72 h) PD catheter placement. After hospital discharge, patients were treated with intermittent PD on alternate days in a dialysis unit until family training was provided. Results: Fifty-one patients fulfilling the following criteria were included: age was 62.1 ± 15 years, with diabetes as the main etiology of end-stage renal disease (39%), and uremia as the main dialysis indication (76%). Metabolic and fluid controls were achieved after 3 sessions of HVPD, and patients remained in intermittent PD for 23.2 ± 7.2 days. Mechanical complications occurred in 25.7% and peritonitis rate was 0.5 episode/patient-year. In the first 6 months, technique and patients survival rates were 86 and 82.4% respectively. Conclusion: The PD modality was a feasible and safe alternative to hemodialysis in the urgent-start dialysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bitencourt Dias, D., Mendes, M. L., Burgugi Banin, V., Barretti, P., & Ponce, D. (2017). Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis: The First Year of Brazilian Experience. Blood Purification, 44(4), 283–287. https://doi.org/10.1159/000478970

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free