An exploration of the barriers to the confident diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome: A survey among general practitioners, gastroenterologists and experts in five European countries

19Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The diagnostic processes for chronic abdominal conditions are challenging. Despite their tendency for diagnostic tests in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms, clinicians are encouraged to make a positive diagnosis based on symptom criteria without alarm signs. We explored how European physicians diagnose and manage patients suffering from IBS. Methods: We conducted a vignette-based survey to evaluate the diagnostic approaches in four standardized patients with IBS with constipation (IBS-C), IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and chronic constipation (CC). General practitioners (GP, n=104), gastroenterologists (GE, n=100) and IBS experts (n=25) from five European countries participated. Results: Experts showed the highest rates of correct diagnoses (88%–92%) for all cases except CC (only 60%) and were more prone to a positive diagnosis (64%/68% in IBS-C/CC), whereas GEs and GPs tended toward a diagnosis by exclusion (63%/63% and 62%/60% in IBS-C/CC). In the CC vignette, conducting tests was more frequent than prescribing treatment among 44% experts, 63% GEs and 36% GPs. The diagnosis of IBD presented little difficulty for any of the participants. Conclusions: This study highlights the difficulties in confidently diagnosing chronic functional bowel conditions, especially for non-experts, whereas IBD caused little difficulty. Differentiating between IBS-C and CC seemed particularly challenging, even for experts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andresen, V., Whorwell, P., Fortea, J., & Auzière, S. (2015). An exploration of the barriers to the confident diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome: A survey among general practitioners, gastroenterologists and experts in five European countries. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 3(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640614558344

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free