N-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of cancer: Accumulating evidence from prospective studies

39Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previous studies on the association between polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and cancer have focused on n-3 PUFAs. To investigate the association between intake or blood levels of n-6 PUFAs and cancer, we searched the PubMed and Embase databases up to March 2020 and conducted a meta-analysis. A total of 70 articles were identified. High blood levels of n-6 PUFAs were associated with an 8% lower risk of all cancers (relative risk (RR) = 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86–0.98) compared to low blood levels of n-6 PUFAs. In the subgroup analyses by cancer site, type of n-6 PUFAs, and sex, the inverse associations were strong for breast cancer (RR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.77–0.98), linoleic acid (LA) (RR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.82–1.00), and women (RR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.79–0.97). In the dose-response analysis, a 2% and 3% decrease in the risk of cancer was observed with a 5% increase in blood levels of n-6 PUFAs and LA, respectively. Thus, there was no significant association between n-6 PUFA intake and the risk of cancer. The pooled RR of cancer for the highest versus lowest category of n-6 PUFA intake was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.99–1.05). Evidence from prospective studies indicated that intake of n-6 PUFAs was not significantly associated with risk of cancer, but blood levels of n-6 PUFAs were inversely associated with risk of cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, Y., & Kim, J. (2020). N-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of cancer: Accumulating evidence from prospective studies. Nutrients, 12(9), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092523

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free