Transpulmonary ultrasound dilution is an acceptable technique for cardiac output measurement in anesthetized pigs

6Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate cardiac output (CO) measurements using transpulmonary ultrasound (TPUD) technology and compare results with those of the gold standard, pulmonary arterial catheter thermodilution (PACTD), in 6 healthy anesthetized pigs during acute hemodynamic changes caused by manipulation of the blood volume. ANIMALS 6 healthy male Landrace pigs. PROCEDURES Over a period of 1 week, pigs were anesthetized with isoflurane, mechanically ventilated, and underwent instrumen-tation in dorsal recumbency. They were subjected to sequential experimental states during which the blood volume was manipulated so that the animals transitioned from normovolemia to hypovolemia (20% and 40% of blood volume depletion), back to normovolemia (autologous blood transfusion), and then to hypervolemia (following colloid bolus). During each volume state, CO measurements were compared between TPUD and PACTD. RESULTS The mean ± SD relative bias between TPUD and PACTD was 7.71% ± 21.2% with limits of agreement –33.9% to 49.3%, indicating TPUD slightly underestimated CO values, compared with values obtained with PACTD. The mean ± SD of the bias between the 2 methods was 0.13 ± 0.5 L/min. Only 5 of 36 (13.9%) TPUD CO measurements had an absolute value of relative bias > 30%. The percentage error calculated for TPUD was 29.4%. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results suggested that TPUD measurements have acceptable agreement with PACTD measurements. Moreover, TPUD exhibits promising potential in being used interchangeably with PACTD for future hemodynamic research involving swine as species of interest.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paranjape, V. V., Shih, A. C., Garcia-Pereira, F. L., & Saksena, S. (2022). Transpulmonary ultrasound dilution is an acceptable technique for cardiac output measurement in anesthetized pigs. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 83(6), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.21.11.0189

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free