Comparison of the efficacy and safety of subthreshold micropulse laser with photodynamic therapy for the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: A meta-analysis

Abstract

Background:This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the therapeutic effect and safety of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) vs photodynamic therapy (PDT) in treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC).Methods:PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for all relevant studies published up to August 17, 2020. Data of interest were analyzed by STATA (version 14.0) software.Results:Four randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 5 retrospective studies with 790 eyes were included in this meta-analysis after study selection. The results showed that SML significantly improved the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) compared with PDT at 6 to 8 weeks, 6 months, and 7 to 8 months in patients with cCSC (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -0.15, 95% confidence intervals (CI): -0.23 to -0.07, P < .01; WMD = -2.83, 95% CI: -4.79 to -0.87, P < .01; and WMD = -2.61, 95% CI: -4.23 to -1.24, P =.026, respectively). There was also a statistically significant difference between SML and PDT groups in the differences in the complete resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) (risk radios = 0.388, 95% CI: 0.307 to 0.491, P < .01). There were no significant differences between the SML and PDT in the overall effect with central macular thickness (CMT), adverse events, complete resolution of SRF and treatment response.Conclusions:Based on the available evidence, this meta-analysis demonstrated that SML may be considered as a competitive alternative to PDT for treating cCSC, and as the first-line treatment of cCSC.