A three-gene predictor for early intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy

18Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We previously developed a DNA microarray-based system that out-performs traditionally used clinical parameters for prediction of early intrahepatic recurrence (IHR) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because DNA microarray is too expensive for daily clinical use, we used a quantitative realtime reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) to develop a lower-cost predictor for early IHR. From the 12 early IHR-related genes integrated in the previous predictor, we selected 6 genes whose levels showed the strongest association between data from the 2 distinct DNA microarray platforms with the same sample set. Expression of these 6 genes relative to that of GAPDH was measured by QRT-PCR in 82 HCCs. Of the 82 HCCs, 39 and 43 were assigned to training and independent test sets, respectively. By searching all combinations (n=2-6) of the 6 genes, we found an optimal combination of 3 genes (HLADRA, DDX17 and LAPTM5) that minimized the leave-one-out error for prediction of early IHR in the training set. The 3-gene predictor constructed with the Fisher linear classifier correctly predicted early IHR or non-recurrence in 35 (81.4%) of 43 HCCs in the independent test set and had a high positive predictive value of 72.7% and a high negative predictive value of 84.4%. Multivariate analysis with the stepwise logistic regression showed that the 3-gene predictor [F(x)<0] was an independent risk factor for early IHR (risk ratio, 13.6; p=0.006), indicating its potential as an easy-to-use predictor for accurate prediction of early IHR of HCC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Somura, H., Iizuka, N., Tamesa, T., Sakamoto, K., Hamaguchi, T., Tsunedomi, R., … Oka, M. (2008). A three-gene predictor for early intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy. Oncology Reports, 19(2), 489–495. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.19.2.489

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free