Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: To systematically evaluate the methodological quality of the current up-to-date guidelines pertaining to choledocholithiasis, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of key recommendations and corresponding evidence, focusing on the heterogeneity among these guidelines. Method: Systematic searches across various databases were performed to identify the latest guidelines. The identified guidelines, which met the inclusion criteria, underwent evaluation using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. The key recommendations and evidence from the included guidelines were extracted and reclassified using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) grading system, and the obtained results were analyzed. Results: Nine guidelines related to choledocholithiasis were included in this study, out of which 4 achieved an overall standardized score of more than 60%, indicating their suitability for recommendation. Upon closer examination of the main recommendations within these guidelines, we discovered significant discrepancies concerning the utilization of similar treatment techniques for different diseases or different treatment methods under comparable conditions, and discrepancies in the recommended treatment duration. High-quality research evidence was lacking, and some recommendations either failed to provide supporting evidence or cited inappropriate and low-level evidence. Conclusion: The quality of guidelines pertaining to choledocholithiasis is uneven. Recommendations for the treatment of choledocholithiasis demonstrate considerable disparities among the guidelines, particularly regarding the utilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as a treatment method and the management approaches for difficult stone cases. Improvements by guideline developers for these factors contributing to the heterogeneity would be a reasonable approach to further update the guidelines for cholangiolithiasis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhu, S. Y., Huang, J., Li, Y. J., Zhou, B., Zheng, C. Y., Sun, D. L., & Fu, Y. (2023, December 26). Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001230

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free