One‐level mini‐open pedicle subtraction osteotomy for treating spinal kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To report a mini-open pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) technique, to summarize the 2-year follow-up results of 25 patients, and to describe a modified operating table which allows the osteotomy to be closed in a more controllable manner. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with AS who received one-level mini-open PSO between July 2015 and January 2018. The 25 patients with complete medical records and 2-year radiographic follow-up were included in the analysis. Estimated blood loss, operation time, incision length, complications, bed rest period, and length of hospitalization were extracted from the medical records and recorded. Results: The mean age of the 25 patients (22 males and 3 females) was 39.5 years. The average global kyphosis(GK) decreased from 70.2° before surgery to 22.3° after surgery; the average C7- sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA) decreased from 15.5 cm before surgery to 5.1 cm after surgery; the average pelvic incidence(PT) decreased from 37.8° before surgery to 22.5° after surgery. The average length of the incision was 10.2 cm. The average surgical time was 263.0 min, the average estimated blood loss was 840.0 ml, and the average time to mobilization was 4.1 days. Conclusions: The current report shows that one-level PSO can be performed through an incision of about 10 cm. The one-level mini-open PSO could be superior to traditional PSO surgery with respect to cosmetic outcomes. Further comparative studies are necessary to evaluate the current and conventional techniques.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, Y., Li, C., Liu, L., & Qi, L. (2021). One‐level mini‐open pedicle subtraction osteotomy for treating spinal kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-03974-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free