Public Space, Common Space, and the Spaces In-Between: A Case Study of Philadelphia's LOVE Park

6Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study concerns the struggle for Philadelphia's LOVE Park, which involved the general public and its functionaries on one side and skateboarders on the other. This paper argues LOVE Park was one place composed of two distinct spaces: the public space the public engendered and the common space the skateboarders produced. This case demonstrates that public and common space must be understood as distinct, for they entail different understandings of publicly accessible space. Additionally, public and common spaces often exist simultaneously as “public-common spaces,” which emphasizes how they reciprocally shape one another. This sheds light on the emergence of “anti-common public space,” which is evident in LOVE Park's 2016 redesign. This concept considers how common spaces are increasingly negated in public spaces. The introduction of common space to the study of public spaces is significant as it allows for more nuanced understandings of transformations in the urban landscape.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cianciotto, L. M. (2020). Public Space, Common Space, and the Spaces In-Between: A Case Study of Philadelphia’s LOVE Park. City and Community, 19(3), 676–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12454

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free