Short-term pre-operative systemic administration with low-dose of steroid does not make a false-negative diagnosis of definite eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitiafter endoscopic sinus surgery

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

According to JESREC criteria, definite eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) is postoperatively diagnosed based on over 70 eosinophils in high power magnification fields of the resected nasal polyps in patients with probable ECRS. Preoperative systemic administration with steroid is a standard practice, because it reduced intraoperative bleeding during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in patients with ECRS. However, it was recently reported that systemic administration with steroid decreased the number of eosinophils in the nasal polyps, leading to a false negative diagnosis of definite ECRS. To overcome the risk, we have adopted short-term pre-operative systemic administration with low-dose of steroid and examined if our steroid administration makes a false-negative diagnosis. We performed a retrospective chart review of 42 patients with probable ECRS. Eleven patients were administered with 0.5 mg of bethametasone for 7 days before ESS, and other 31 patients were not administered. The average number of eosinophils in nasal polyps in patients who were administered with steroid was 188 ± 167, which was not different from 199 ± 149 in the patients who were not administered. These findings suggest that short-term preoperative administration with low-dose of steroid has few risk of a false-negative diagnosis of definite ECRS. J. Med. Invest. 66: 233-236, August, 2019

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fujimoto, C., Tamura, K., Takaishi, S., Kawata, I., Kitamura, Y., & Takeda, N. (2019). Short-term pre-operative systemic administration with low-dose of steroid does not make a false-negative diagnosis of definite eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitiafter endoscopic sinus surgery. Journal of Medical Investigation, 66(3.4), 233–236. https://doi.org/10.2152/jmi.66.233

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free