Predicting sensory cohesiveness, hardness and springiness of solid foods from instrumental measurements

118Citations
Citations of this article
151Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The sensory evaluation of cohesiveness, hardness and springiness of 15 solid food samples was performed by eight trained assessors. The rheologic response of the 15 samples was estimated by performing cyclic compression tests and stress-relaxation tests. From the force-deformation curves of the first two cycles of the compression test, texture profile analysis parameters related to cohesiveness, hardness and springiness were calculated. Young's modulus (E), strain (di) and stress (si) at peak as well as irrecoverable strain (ri) and irrecoverable work (Li) were monitored during the first five cycles. From the stress-relaxation response, Peleg's linearization model parameters, K1 and K2, were estimated by best-fit regression. These parameters were used for predicting sensory attributes. Hardness and springiness were both accurately predicted by rheologic properties, while cohesiveness prediction was less representative. © 2008, Blackwell Publishing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Di Monaco, R., Cavella, S., & Masi, P. (2008). Predicting sensory cohesiveness, hardness and springiness of solid foods from instrumental measurements. Journal of Texture Studies, 39(2), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.2008.00134.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free