Arthur Schopenhauer and the Current Conception of the Origin of Species: What Did the Philosopher Anticipate?

3Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) was deeply influenced by Plato and conceived each species as an Idea, whose shape is essentially and permanently predetermined. He rejected Lamarck’s proposal of organ’s use/disuse as a source of evolution, but he was close to the orthogenetic movement that developed after his death. The philosopher did not conceive biological individual variability as a source for evolution, mathematical population analysis, and gradual evolution; he even imagined an ultra-rapid saltatory model in “higher forms.” Moreover, he conceived a metaphysically based coupling among all phenomena which resembles the contemporary model of natural drift of evolution. Hence, Schopenhauer did not strictly anticipate Darwin’s model of natural selection. However, he expressed in his own words competition and struggle for life. The philosopher thus anticipated more the orthogenesis and natural drift and less the Darwinian’s mechanisms of evolution than what is generally alleged. His work is a valuable philosophical source in the contemporary search for a new synthesis in evolutionary thought.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

7Citations
5Readers
1Citations
41Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baptista, T., Aldana, E., & Abramson, C. I. (2019, January 1). Arthur Schopenhauer and the Current Conception of the Origin of Species: What Did the Philosopher Anticipate? SAGE Open. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019837467

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

58%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

17%

Researcher 2

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

38%

Psychology 3

38%

Decision Sciences 1

13%

Chemical Engineering 1

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 36

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0