Benveniste et la représentation du sens : de l'arbitraire du signe à l'objet extra-linguistique

  • Bouquet S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The topic of this paper is to show how Benveniste's criticism of Saussure in the famous Nature du signe linguistique (1939), based on the Cours de linguistique générale, cannot be considered as pertinent refered to the original saussurian texts due to be published some decades later. This point is argued regarding as well the matter of arbitrariness and the question of extra-linguistic reference.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bouquet, S. (1997). Benveniste et la représentation du sens : de l’arbitraire du signe à l’objet extra-linguistique. Linx, (9), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.4000/linx.1008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free