Food-entrained rhythmic expression of PER2 and BMAL1 in murine megakaryocytes does not correlate with circadian rhythms in megakaryopoiesis

13Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Circadian rhythms control a vast array of biological processes in a broad spectrum of organisms. The contribution of circadian rhythms to the development of megakaryocytes and the regulation of platelet biology has not been defined. Objectives: This study tested the hypothesis that murine megakaryocytes exhibit hallmarks of circadian control. Methods: Mice expressing a PER2::LUCIFERASE circadian reporter protein and C57BI/6 mice were used to establish if megakaryocytes expressed circadian genes in vitro and in vivo. Mice were also subjected to 3 weeks on a restricted feeding regime to separate food-entrained from light-entrained circadian rhythms. Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), flow cytometry and imunohistochemistry were employed to analyse gene expression, DNA content and cell-cycle behavior in megakaryocytes collected from mice over a 24-h period. Results: Megakaryocytes exhibited rhythmic expression of the clock genes mPer2 and mBmal1 and circadian rhythms in megakaryopoiesis. mPer2 and mBmal1 expression phase advanced 8h to coincide with the availability of food; however, food availability had a more complex effect on megakaryopoiesis, leading to a significant overall increase in megakaryocyte ploidy levels and cell-cycle activity. Conclusions: Normal megakaryopoiesis requires synchrony between food- and light-entrained circadian oscillators. © 2008 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hartley, P. S., John Sheward, W., French, K., Horn, J. M., Holmes, M. C., & Harmar, A. J. (2008). Food-entrained rhythmic expression of PER2 and BMAL1 in murine megakaryocytes does not correlate with circadian rhythms in megakaryopoiesis. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 6(7), 1144–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02978.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free