Anarchy as Architect: Competitive Pr essur e, Technology, and the Internal Structure of States

4Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The internal institutional structures of states greatly impact their citizens' welfare. However, states are not at complete liberty to adopt any internal form. Competitive pressure arising from anarchy limits the range of viable domestic institutions to those that do not impose a significant disadvantage. We argue that technological change can alter the relative competitiveness of different state forms and, by extension, improve or degrade human welfare. We empirically support this argument through a macrohistorical survey of competitively significant technologies. We conclude that the true costs of international anarchy are greater than commonly appreciated, as competitive pressure may force states to evolve into forms detrimental to the welfare of their inhabitants. Moreover, the adoption of state forms that improve human well-being is often driven by technological change as much as human agency. Finally, the invention of seemingly beneficial technologies may decrease human well-being by improving the competitiveness of inegalitarian state forms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Macinnes, M., Garfinkel, B., & Dafoe, A. (2024). Anarchy as Architect: Competitive Pr essur e, Technology, and the Internal Structure of States. International Studies Quarterly, 68(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae111

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free