Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impacts of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) have been captured in clinical studies using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) that are validated for other diseases. However, the validity evidence to support the use of existing PROMs in patients with TTP is unknown. In a systematic review of the literature, including studies of adults and children with TTP, we assessed the validity evidence for use of PROMs in clinical research and clinical practice, characterized HRQoL, described the integration of PROMs in clinical practice and evaluated PRO scores for patients with TTP compared with reference populations. From an initial 4518 studies, we identified 14 studies using 16 PROMs to assess general HRQoL domains in patients in remission. No identified studies assessed the validity of PROMs for the context of use of TTP and no studies described PROM integration into TTP clinical practice or evaluated PROMs that were specific for patients with TTP. Moreover, PRO scores were worse in patients with TTP compared with reference populations and other chronic conditions. We conclude that, in patients with TTP, PROMs pick up on important patient experiences not captured by clinical outcomes at present. There is, therefore, a need for studies that assess the validity of existing PROMs in patients with TTP to determine if TTP-specific PROMs specific to patients with TTP should be developed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Soares Ferreira Junior, A., Pinheiro Maux Lessa, M., Kaplan, S., Coles, T. M., Terrell, D. R., & Onwuemene, O. A. (2023, August 1). Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Clinical Medicine. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155155

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free