Self-medication practices among diabetic patients in Kuwait

26Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of self-medication with proprietary medicines and/or herbs among diabetic patients and evaluate factors associated with self-medication among diabetic patients. Subjects and Methods: A total of 104 diabetic patients were selected randomly from eight diabetic clinics from three governorates. Data were collected via face-to-face structured interview of the respondents in the clinics using a developed and piloted questionnaire. Results: The response rate was 96.2%. Seventy-four percent of the study participants reported that they seek medical consultation when they get an illness, 92% indicated that they know that the use of medicines and/or herbs to treat an illness without a medical consultation can be harmful. Only 13% of the respondents reported that they had used medicine or herbs without medical consultation to treat an illness within the previous 2 months of the study period. Nine percent of the study population reported that they used herbs to treat diabetes, and 2% used them for other illness. Only two (2%) indicated that they used medicines, which were analgesics, diet pills and vitamins. There was no significant association between self-medication with medicines or herbs and the sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The prevalence of self-medication with medicines, including herbs, among diabetic patients in Kuwait is low. Enforcement of a strict prescription policy and coverage of medical consultation and treatment by health insurance may have contributed to low self-medication practices among diabetic patients. Copyright © 2008 S. Karger AG.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Awad, A., Al-Rabiy, S., & Abahussain, E. (2008). Self-medication practices among diabetic patients in Kuwait. Medical Principles and Practice, 17(4), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1159/000129612

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free