Transvenous removal of pacing and ICD leads: 15 years experience from a referral center

  • Bongiorni M
  • Soldati E
  • Segreti L
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Device related complications are rising the need of Transvenous Lead Removal (TLR). Transvenous extraction of Pacing (PL) and Defibrillating Leads (DL) is a highly effective technique. Aim of this report is to analyse the longstanding experience performed in a single Italian Referral Center. Methods: Since January 1997 to December 2012, we managed 1958 consecutive patients (1489 men, mean age 65.6 years) with 3539 leads (mean pacing period 70.7 months, range 1-420). PL were 2936 (1457 ventricular, 1207 atrial, 272 coronary sinus leads), DL were 603 (582 ventricular, 6 atrial, 15 superior vena cava leads). Indications to TLR were infection in 83% (systemic 27%, local 56%) of leads. We performed mechanical dilatation using a single polypropylene sheath technique (Cook Vascular - Leechburg PA, USA) and if necessary, other intravascular tools (Catchers and Lassos, Osypka, Grentzig-Whylen, G); an Approach through the Internal Jugular Vein (JA) was performed in case of free-floating leads or failure of the standard approach. Results: Removal was attempted in 3531 leads because the technique was not applicable in 8 PL. Among these, 3463 leads were completely removed (98.1%), 35 (1%) partially removed, 33 (0.9%) not removed. Among 3449 exposed leads, 532 were removed by manual traction (15.4%), 2586 by mechanical dilatation using the venous entry site (75.0%), 25 by femoral approach (FA) (0.7%) and 238 by JA (7%). All the free-floating leads were completely removed, 25.6% by FA and 74.4% by JA. Major complications occurred in 12 cases (0.6%): cardiac tamponade (11 cases, 2 deaths), hemotorax (1 death). Conclusions: Our experience shows that in centers with wide experience, TLR using single sheath mechanical dilatation has a high success rate and a very low incidence of serious complications. TLR through the Internal Jugular Vein increases the effectiveness and safety of the procedure also in case of free-floating or challenging leads.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bongiorni, M. G., Soldati, E., Segreti, L., Zucchelli, G., Di Cori, A., De Lucia, R., … Levorato, D. (2013). Transvenous removal of pacing and ICD leads: 15 years experience from a referral center. European Heart Journal, 34(suppl 1), P3656–P3656. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht309.p3656

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free