Does attractiveness influence condom use intentions in women who have sex with men?

7Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives Attractiveness judgements have been shown to affect interpersonal relationships. The present study explored the relationships between perceived attractiveness, perceived sexual health status, condom use intentions and condom use resistance in women. Setting The study data were collected using an online questionnaire. Participants 480 English-speaking women who have sex with men, between 18-32 years old. Outcome measures Women were asked to rate the attractiveness of 20 men on the basis of facial photographs, to estimate the likelihood that each man had a sexually transmitted infection (STI), and to indicate their willingness to have sex with each man without a condom. Condom resistance tactics were also measured and their influence on condom use intentions was assessed. Results The more attractive a man was judged to be, the more likely it was that participants were willing to have sex with him (r (478) = 0.987, p < .001). Further, the more attractive a man was judged to be, the less likely women were to intend to use a condom during sex (r = -0.552, df = 478, p = .007). The average perceived STI likelihood for a man had no significant association with his average perceived attractiveness or with participants' average willingness to have sex with him. The more attractive a participant judged herself to be, the more she believed that, overall, men are likely to have a STI (r = 0.103, df = 478, p < .05). Conclusions Women's perceptions of men's attractiveness influence their condom use intentions; such risk biases should be incorporated into sexual health education programmes and condom use interventions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eleftheriou, A., Bullock, S., Graham, C. A., Skakoon-Sparling, S., & Ingham, R. (2019). Does attractiveness influence condom use intentions in women who have sex with men? PLoS ONE, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217152

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free