Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions

334Citations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many engineering applications are characterized by implicit response functions that are expensive to evaluate and sometimes nonlinear in their behavior, making reliability analysis difficult. This paper develops an efficient reliability analysis method that accurately characterizes the limit state throughout the random variable space. The method begins with a Gaussian process model built from a very small number of samples, and then adaptively chooses where to generate subsequent samples to ensure that the model is accurate in the vicinity of the limit state. The resulting Gaussian process model is then sampled using multimodal adaptive importance sampling to calculate the probability of exceeding (or failing to exceed) the response level of interest. By locating multiple points on or near the limit state, more complex and nonlinear limit states can be modeled, leading to more accurate probability integration. By concentrating the samples in the area where accuracy is important (i.e., in the vicinity of the limit state), only a small number of true function evaluations are required to build a quality surrogate model. The resulting method is both accurate for any arbitrarily shaped limit state and computationally efficient even for expensive response functions. This new method is applied to a collection of example problems including one that analyzes the reliability of a microelectromechanical system device that current available methods have difficulty solving either accurately or efficiently. Copyright © 2008 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bichon, B. J., Eldred, M. S., Swiler, L. P., Mahadevan, S., & McFarland, J. M. (2008). Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions. AIAA Journal, 46(10), 2459–2468. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.34321

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free