Enhancing genome-enabled prediction by bagging genomic BLUP

Citations of this article
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.


We examined whether or not the predictive ability of genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) could be improved via a resampling method used in machine learning: bootstrap aggregating sampling ("bagging"). In theory, bagging can be useful when the predictor has large variance or when the number of markers is much larger than sample size, preventing effective regularization. After presenting a brief review of GBLUP, bagging was adapted to the context of GBLUP, both at the level of the genetic signal and of marker effects. The performance of bagging was evaluated with four simulated case studies including known or unknown quantitative trait loci, and an application was made to real data on grain yield in wheat planted in four environments. A metric aimed to quantify candidate-specific cross-validation uncertainty was proposed and assessed; as expected, model derived theoretical reliabilities bore no relationship with cross-validation accuracy. It was found that bagging can ameliorate predictive performance of GBLUP and make it more robust against over-fitting. Seemingly, 25-50 bootstrap samples was enough to attain reasonable predictions as well as stable measures of individual predictive mean squared errors.




Gianola, D., Weigel, K. A., Krämer, N., Stella, A., & Schön, C. C. (2014). Enhancing genome-enabled prediction by bagging genomic BLUP. PLoS ONE, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091693

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free