Erroneous quadruped walking depictions in natural history museums

5Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Since the work of the photographer Eadweard Muybridge in the 1880s [1,2], experts know well how quadruped animals walk. All walking tetrapods advance their legs in the same sequence, and only the timing of supporting feet may differ [3-6]. Given the long time since Muybridge's work, one would assume that this knowledge should be reflected in the depictions of walking quadrupeds made by work of painters, taxidermists, anatomists and toy designers. The postures of legs of walking horses, however, are frequently erroneously illustrated in the fine arts [7]. To see if this also applies to museums, veterinary books and toy shops, we collected hundreds of walking depictions and tested whether or not they correctly display limb positions. We found that almost half of the depictions are wrong. This high error rate in walking illustrations in natural history museums and veterinary anatomy books is particularly unexpected in a time where high-speed cameras and the internet offer ideal possibilities to obtain reliable quantitative information about tetrapod walking. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Horváth, G., Csapó, A., Nyeste, A., Gerics, B., Csorba, G., & Kriska, G. (2009, January 27). Erroneous quadruped walking depictions in natural history museums. Current Biology. Cell Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free