Evidence for a delay in diagnosis of Wilms' tumour in the UK compared with Germany: Implications for primary care for children

15Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The UK has a longstanding system of general practice which provides the vast majority of primary care, including that for children. It acts as a 'gatekeeper' to more specialist care. Parents may also use accident and emergency departments as their first point of medical contact for their children. Outcomes in the UK for many conditions in children appear to be worse than in comparable European countries where there is direct access to care by paediatricians. We have therefore looked at pathways to diagnosis and compared outcomes in the childhood kidney cancer, Wilms' tumour, which has been treated in the UK and Germany within the same clinical trial for over a decade. We find that Wilms' tumours are significantly larger in volume and have a more advanced tumour stage at diagnosis in the UK compared to Germany. There is a small (∼3%) difference in event free and overall survival between the two countries. Our data suggest that the system of primary care for children in the UK is less likely to result in the incidental finding of an abdominal mass in a child with no or vague symptoms. This may be a reason for the poorer outcome.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pritchard-Jones, K., Graf, N., Van Tinteren, H., & Craft, A. (2016). Evidence for a delay in diagnosis of Wilms’ tumour in the UK compared with Germany: Implications for primary care for children. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 101(5), 417–420. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-309212

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free