Examining publishing practices: Moving beyond the idea of predatory open access

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The word ‘predatory' has become an obstacle to a serious discussion of publishing practices. Its use has been both overinclusive, encompassing practices that, while undesirable, are not malicious, and underinclusive, missing many exploitative practices outside the open access sphere. The article examines different business models for scholarly publishing and considers the potential for abuse with each model. After looking at the problems of both blacklists and so-called ‘whitelists', the author suggests that the best path forward would be to create tools to capture the real experience of individual authors as they navigate the publishing process with different publishers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, K. L. (2017, November 1). Examining publishing practices: Moving beyond the idea of predatory open access. Insights: The UKSG Journal. Ubiquity Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.388

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free