Predicting urine culture results in candidates for lithotripsy

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background Urological guidelines assert that "urine culture should be obtained"before surgical management of ureteral or kidney stones. Thus, many surgeries are delayed by 1-3 days until the results of urine culture are available. During this time, the patient frequently experience pain and possible kidney damage. We investigated the hypothesis that it is possible to predict the results of urine culture in candidates for surgical intervention using parameters that are accessible immediately upon admission. Materials and methods: A database of 1000 patients who underwent either percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or ureteroscopy/retrograde intrarenal surgery was analyzed. Eleven parameters potentially related to urinary infections and accessible to the clinician at the emergency department were correlated with the preoperative urine culture results. Results: Of the patients, 234 (23.4 %) had positive cultures. On multivariate analysis, only sex, hydronephrosis grade, and history of previous nephrolithotomy were significantly associated with a positive preoperative urine culture. The risk of a positive culture can be easily determined from a simple table or an Excel-based calculator. This risk could be as low as 0.45% for a man without a history of PCNL and no hydronephrosis (4% in a woman with similar parameters) or as high as 79.5% in a man with a history of PCNL and hydronephrosis (85% in a woman with similar parameters). Conclusions: The risk of preoperative positive urine culture can be predicted using 3 parameters that are accessible upon admission. In low-risk cases, prompt surgical treatment can be provided, eliminating the anticipation time for urine culture results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gofrit, O. N., Abudi, R., Lorber, A., & Duvdevani, M. (2023). Predicting urine culture results in candidates for lithotripsy. Current Urology, 17(2), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000117

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free