AAN position statement: Ethical issues in clinical research in neurology

19Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This update to the American Academy of Neurology's 1998 position statement endeavors to provide guidance for the consistent ethical conduct and review of neurologic research involving human participants. It does so by outlining a widely used ethical framework of 7 principles derived from the foundational documents of modern bioethics, including the Nuremberg Code, the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report, and the US Department of Health and Human Service's Common Rule. The position statement then applies this principle-based framework to analyze and produce recommendations for the management of common and important ethical issues encountered in neurologic clinical research. These include institutional review board oversight, equitable research participant inclusion, cognitive impairment in research participants, international studies, the replication crisis, and genetic testing and modification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tolchin, B., Conwit, R., Epstein, L. G., & Russell, J. A. (2020). AAN position statement: Ethical issues in clinical research in neurology. Neurology, 94(15), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009241

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free