Depoimentos de mulheres sobre a menopausa e o tratamento de seus sintomas

9Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the perception of a group of women from Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil, with respect to menopause and its treatment. METHODS. A secondary analysis was performed on data from a population-based, cross sectional study carried out with 378 Brazilian born women between 40 and 65 years of age, with 11 years or more of formal education. Some women added spontaneous comments to the end of the questionnaire on sexuality handed out by research assistants and self-responded anonymously. There were those who provided comments at the end of the questionnaire and those who did not. The groups were compared with respect to sociodemographic and reproductive characteristics using Pearson's chi-square test. Comments were transcribed in their entirety to a computerized file for thematic content analysis, and units of meaning were identified and classified. RESULTS. Approximately one-third of the women (114/378) provided comments. Significantly more women with lower income levels provided comments as compared to those with higher income levels. The principal identified categories of analysis were: a) uncertainty and/or confusion, mainly with regard to anguish, stress and doubts about menopause; b) symptoms that lead to negative feelings, such as hot flushes, vaginal dryness and mood changes; and c) hormone replacement therapy, fears and perception of a lack of conviction in the physicians who prescribe it. CONCLUSION. The comments indicate that more attention must be given to the problems perceived in climacteric women with a special emphasis on those of the lower incomes levels.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lúcia Valadares, A., Pinto-Neto, A. M., Conde, D. M., Osis, M. J., De Sousa, M. H., & Costa-Paiva, L. (2008). Depoimentos de mulheres sobre a menopausa e o tratamento de seus sintomas. Revista Da Associacao Medica Brasileira, 54(4), 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-42302008000400013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free