Review—Subzero Automotive Fuel Cells: Water Fill Tests vs Cold-Starts

  • Rice C
14Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Subzero cold-starts are one of the last remaining challenges to the commercialization of automotive fuel cells. The ultimate cold-start target is to exothermically self-start a fuel cell stack from −20 °C to attain 50% rated power within 30 s, expending only 5 MJ of start-up/shutdown power—currently unattainable with today’s materials, thus exacerbating the performance gap of future advanced materials. There exists a disconnect between published subzero isothermal water fill test results and industrially relevant cold-starts. For an isothermal water fill test in a single cell at −20 °C, the highest water fill capacity (7.8 m g H 2 O c m − 2 in 2100 s) was observed for the lowest applied galvanostatic load of 10 mA cm −2 with the lowest initial water content ( λ initial = 2.2). Conversely, the fastest time to 0 °C for a 36-cell stack from −20 °C was 54 s under an adaptive applied galvanostatic/potentiostatic load, due to adjacent cell heating accelerating the overall stack’s thermal rise. A higher λ initial of 6.2 or greater enhances the cold-start performance and thermal response of a stack. For unassisted cold-starts, both convective mass/heat flux are necessary to avoid accumulation of ice and to overcome the thermal mass of the endplates of a stack with 20-cells or more.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rice, C. A. (2021). Review—Subzero Automotive Fuel Cells: Water Fill Tests vs Cold-Starts. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 168(4), 044513. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/abf4ec

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free