Does injecting small amounts of fillers prevent the development of secondary blindness?

11Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Inadvertent entry of filler products into the supratrochlear, supraorbital, or dorsal nasal arteries, among other branches of the ophthalmic artery, might result in an immediate and devastating loss of vision. We wanted to examine how much filler could block the ophthalmic artery. Materials and Methods: Twenty-nine fresh cadavers were examined. We exposed the arterial supply to the opthalmic artery by dissecting the orbital area. Thereafter, 17 filler injections were introduced into the supratrochlear, supraorbital, and dorsal nasal arteries each. The amount of filler injection that completely blocked the ophthalmic artery was measured. Additionally, one of the head specimens was processed using phosphotungstic acid-based contrast enhancement micro-computed tomography to analyze each arteries to obstruct its whole ophthalmic artery. Results: The supratrochlear, supraorbital, and dorsal nasal arteries had mean volumes in milliliter (mean ± standard deviation) of 0.0397 ± 0.010 mL, 0.0409 ± 0.00932 mL, and 0.0368 ± 0.00732 mL, respectively. However, the arteries did not differ significantly. Conclusion: Even a modest amount of filler injection can completely block the ophthalmic artery, resulting in visual loss.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yi, K. H., Lee, H. J., Kim, W. R., An, M. H., Park, H. J., Hu, H., & Kim, H. J. (2024). Does injecting small amounts of fillers prevent the development of secondary blindness? Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 23(1), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15898

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free