Leisure, economy and colonial urbanism: Darjeeling, 1835-1930

14Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article posits that the hill station of Darjeeling was a unique form of colonial urbanism. It shifts historiographical interest from major urban centres in colonial India (such as Bombay or Calcutta) and instead attempts a greater understanding of smaller urban centres. In the process, it also interrogates the category of hill stations, which have been understood as exotic and scenic sites rather than as towns that were integral to the colonial economy. In arguing that hill stations, particularly Darjeeling, were not merely the scenic and healthy 'other' of the clamorous, dirty and diseased plains of India, it refutes suggestions that the 'despoiling' or overcrowding of Darjeeling was incremental to the purposes of its establishment. Instead, it suggests that Darjeeling was part of the colonial mainstream; its urbanization and inclusion into the greater colonial economy was effected from the time of its establishment. Therefore, a constant tension between its exotic and its functional elements persisted throughout. Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhattacharya, N. (2013). Leisure, economy and colonial urbanism: Darjeeling, 1835-1930. Urban History, 40(3), 442–461. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963926813000394

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free