Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values as a Complementary Tool in Prostate Gland Disease: Retrospective Evaluation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values with Pathological Data Guided by PI-RADSv2.1

  • Yücel Oğuzdoğan G
  • Adıbelli Z
  • Şefik E
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: This retrospective study reveals whether a lesion is a benign pathological process or malignant by measuring apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values following prostate imaging reporting and diagnostic system version 2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1) guide on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MpMRI) examinations. Furthermore, this study aims to determine the cut-off ADC values (ADCv) that may exist to help identify and distinguish between benign and the malignant lesions. Additionally, the paper evaluates whether there is a correlation between malignant lesions' International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) score and ADCv, and whether ADCv provide information about prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness without requiring invasive procedures.Materials and Methods: The study group consised of 243 patients. The lesions were diagnosed using transrectal ultrasound-guided cognitive MRI fusion. MpMRI images before the biopsy were evaluated according to PI-RADSv2.1 guideline by a radiologist. Three groups, benign prostatic tissue, prostatitis, and PCa were obtained according to the histopathological results.Results: When the cut-off value for ADC was 780x10-3, sensitivity was 80%. When the cut-off value was taken as 668x10-3, the sensitivity and specificity were 72% and 62%, respectively. When the cut-off ADCv was taken as 647x10-3, the sensitivity was 83% and the specificity was 48.5%. ADCv varied significantly depending on the ISUP groups (p=0.003). It was determined that the ISUP 1 group was significantly higher compared to other groups. ADC group mean values were not significantly different between groups 2, 3, 4, and 5.Conclusion: ADCv may be a suitable tool for estimating PCa aggressiveness, and it shows a significant potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yücel Oğuzdoğan, G., Adıbelli, Z. H., Şefik, E., & Arslan, F. Z. (2023). Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values as a Complementary Tool in Prostate Gland Disease: Retrospective Evaluation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values with Pathological Data Guided by PI-RADSv2.1. The Bulletin of Urooncology, 22(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.4274/uob.galenos.2022.2022.4.2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free