Hope-based interventions in chronic disease: an integrative review in the light of Nightingale

13Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To identify the available evidence in the scientific literature about the strategies or interventions used to promote hope in people with chronic diseases. Method: An integrative literature review of literature published between 2009-2019, which was conducted in online browsers/databases: b-On, EBSCO, PubMed, Medline, ISI, SciELO, PsycINFO, Google Scholar. Forty-one studies were found, of which eight met the inclusion criteria. Results: Most studies used a quantitative approach. There was a predominance of studies from Asia and America, addressing patients with multiple sclerosis, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and cancer. Hope-based interventions were categorized by the hope attributes: experiential process, spiritual/transcendence process, rational thought process, and relational process. Conclusion: Hope-based interventions, in its essence, are good clinical practices in the physical, psychological, social and spiritual domains. This is congruent with the vision of nursing, first proposed by Florence Nightingale. There seem to be gaps in the literature regarding specific hope promoting interventions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Laranjeira, C. A., Querido, A. I. F., Charepe, Z. B., & Dixe, M. D. A. C. R. (2020). Hope-based interventions in chronic disease: an integrative review in the light of Nightingale. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. Associacao Brasilerira de Enfermagem. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0283

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free