Comparative Politics in Borderlands: Actors, Identities, and Strategies

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Comparativists are increasingly researching national border regions. Yet the distinct way in which proximity to borders independently shapes politics is rarely theorized explicitly. Drawing on the emerging subdiscipline of border studies, we identify three types of border effects: Borders involve specific actors, shape local identities, and provide distinct strategies, each of which directly affects key areas of comparative politics. An in-depth review of work on political violence and state formation shows that specifying these effects (a) demands that comparativists consider the ways in which borderlands differ from other regions and be careful in attributing processes found there to nations as a whole, (b) improves theories by elucidating scope conditions, and (c) scrutinizes the validity of our research designs and measurement strategies. We end with a call to move from a comparative politics in border regions to a comparative politics of border regions that contextualizes how borders alter political processes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Braun, R., & Kienitz, O. (2022, February 1). Comparative Politics in Borderlands: Actors, Identities, and Strategies. Annual Review of Political Science. Annual Reviews Inc. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-010103

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free