Development and validation of an aetiology in delirium diagnostic support tool

0Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: to develop and show proof of principle of a diagnostic support tool (DST) for identification of causes of delirium. Methods: stage 1-development of the aetiology in delirium-diagnostic support tool (AiD-DST); stage 2-validation of the AiD-DST against reference standard diagnosis, based on clinical assessment from two independent consultant geriatricians. Results: a series of eight steps AiD-DST were formulated by an expert group to identify possible causes of delirium. Forty inpatients admitted to a general medical unit with a consultant physician/geriatrician diagnosis of delirium were recruited, consented and reviewed against the AiD-DST. Mean age was 85.1 (standard deviation 7.9) years and 26 (65%) of participants were female. Participants had multiple chronic co-morbidities [median Charlson Comorbidity Index 7; interquartile range (IQR 6-9)] and median number of medications was 8 (IQR 6-11.75). Median number of causes of delirium detected on AiD-DST was 3 (IQR 3-4) versus 5 (IQR 3-6) using the reference standard diagnosis, with sensitivity of 88.8% (95% confidence interval, 81.6-93.9%) and specificity of 71.8% (63-79.5%). Conclusions: the aetiology in delirium DST shows promise in the identification of cause(s) in delirium.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eeles, E., Huang, L., Dakin, L., Ling, C., Dunn, E., Fraser, J., & Dissanayaka, N. N. (2021). Development and validation of an aetiology in delirium diagnostic support tool. Age and Ageing, 50(4), 1402–1405. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa269

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free