The Act on Anti-Terrorism for the Protection of Citizens and Public Security passed in 2016 despite the longest filibuster in the history of Korean legislation. While counterterrorism legislation can often present dangers of overreaching state authority and risks to citizens' rights in any country, the South Korean narrative is uniquely layered given the historical context of anti-communist discourse. This article argues that the Act mitigates accusations of human rights violations by assuming dual legal purposes of national security and disaster management as well as employing human rights discourse and safeguards within the law. However, expansive executive and agency discretion, ambiguities in terrorist discourse, and lack of due process undermine human rights compliance, endangering both citizens' and foreigners' rights against unwarranted government intrusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
CITATION STYLE
Geodde, P., & Kim, W. (2017). Balancing the Act on Anti-Terrorism in South Korea. UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/p8351038201
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.