Source identification on high PM2.5 days using SEM/EDS, XRF, raman, and windblown dust modeling

16Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

When community exposures to PM2.5 are high, identification of the particle sources enables more effective control and assessment of health impacts. This study demonstrates forensic particle analysis methods that can be used when only limited, archived samples are available. Federal reference method (FRM) filters from seven high PM2.5 days were analyzed using optical and electron microscopy, X-ray fluorescence, and Raman micro-spectroscopy to determine individual particle morphology and composition, together with supplemental wind roses, GIS mapping, FRM inlet penetration calculations, and windblown dust modeling. This approach identified three distinct sources of high PM2.5 measurements: 1) local, windblown dust from an atypical direction, consistent with modeling predictions for a normally operating PM2.5 inlet challenged with a high concentration of windblown dust particles, potentially enhanced by re-entrainment of particles from within the inlet, 2) wintertime, regional, hygroscopic, nitrogen-and sulfur-rich salts, consistent with ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulfate, and 3) sampling or documentation error. This approach can be used in any location in which regulatory PM filters and other air quality data are available.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wagner, J., Wang, Z. M., Ghosal, S., & Wall, S. (2019). Source identification on high PM2.5 days using SEM/EDS, XRF, raman, and windblown dust modeling. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 19(11), 2518–2530. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.05.0276

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free