Genomic reconsideration of fish non-monophyly: why cannot we simply call them all ‘fish’?

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Extant ‘fishes’ belong to jawless, cartilaginous, actinopterygian, or sarcopterygian fish lineages. They comprise a non-monophyletic group of vertebrates from which tetrapods are excluded, and they are therefore paraphyletic. Recent advances in whole-genome sequencing have shed light on phylogenetic relationships, divergence times among major fish lineages, and the molecular basis of phenotypic diversity. This review encompasses the diversity of extant fishes and explores the variation in genomic organization and its evolutionary origins. This review begins with evaluating available genomic sequence resources with a focus on literally complete (‘telomere-to-telomere’) sequencing. Next, it discusses among-lineage variations in genomic contents, considering karyotype reports, genome sizes, and whole-genome duplication events. Additionally, we investigate three families of protein-coding genes, visual opsins, aquaporins (Aqps), and Hox genes, as they offer insights into morphological and physiological differences among major fish lineages. Overall, our technical basis of analyzing fish genomes and the knowledge of genomic organization provide valuable insights into our vertebrate-wide understanding of how molecular mechanisms specifying variable phenotypes are encoded in genomic sequence information.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuraku, S., Sato, M., Yoshida, K., & Uno, Y. (2024, January 1). Genomic reconsideration of fish non-monophyly: why cannot we simply call them all ‘fish’? Ichthyological Research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-023-00939-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free