Benchmark tests for strong ground motion prediction methods: Case for numerical methods (Part 3)

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We performed a benchmark test for strong motion simulation methods using numerical methods (finite difference method and finite element method). We simulated four observed earthquakes considering a Kanto basin model. All the results calculated by six teams from different institutions generally show good agreement to each other. We found that the choice of grid space makes difference of allocation of soil parameters near the surface. It generates difference of waveforms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yoshimura, C., Nagano, M., Hisada, Y., Aoi, S., Iwaki, A., Hayakawa, T., … Kawabe, H. (2013). Benchmark tests for strong ground motion prediction methods: Case for numerical methods (Part 3). AIJ Journal of Technology and Design, 19(41), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijt.19.65

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free