Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was designed to investigate the validity, reliability, and cultural adaptation of the Turkish version of the self-reported disability status scale (SRDSS). Materials and Methods: This study was designed as prospective, methodological, and cross-sectional. Turkish translation and cross-cultural adaptation of SRDSS was conducted. SRDSS scores were compared with Expanded Disability Status Scale and Patient Determined Disease Steps to test the concurrent validity. The validity and test-retest reliability of the Turkish SRDSS were investigated in 128 persons with MS. Results: A very strong correlation was found between SRDSS and Expanded Disability Status Scale (r=-0.920, p=0.000) and Patient Determined Disease Steps (r=0.857, p=0.000). The mean of the first test of SRDSS was 1.29±0.59, and the mean of the retest test was 1.30±0.61. A very high correlation was found between test and retest (p<0.001, r=0.967). Bland-Altman analysis showed that SRDSS was reproducible with upper and lower limits of agreement of 0.2929 and -0.3089, respectively (bias=-0.008; p=0.566). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found to be 0.983 (excellent reliability). For inter-rater agreement, the ICC values in the individual test were 0.967 (954 CI; 0.954– 0.977). Conclusion: This study showed that the Turkish version of SDRSS is a valid and reliable measurement tool. In cases where Expanded Disability Status Scale cannot be applied, the Turkish version of SRDSS can be used as an alternative assessment method.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
BİLEK, F., & DEMİR, C. F. (2022). Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Self-Reported Disability Status Scale in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis. Balıkesır Health Sciences Journal. https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.1022783
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.