Identification of confusable odours including wines: Appropriate labels enhance performance

5Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study examined how the effectiveness of training people to identify confusable odour samples depends on the kind of label used in the task. In Experiments 1-3 participants were required to identify three compound odour samples (AX, BX and CX) containing a common element, Citral (X), using a multiple-choice test (A vs B vs C) on each trial. Participants given appropriate labels for the stimuli (Appropriate condition) performed better than participants who produced their own labels, but only in the first training block (Experiment 1). Participants given appropriate labels also performed better than participants trained to give inappropriate (Experiment 2) or irrelevant labels (Experiment 3). Subsequently, wine samples of similar discriminability to the compound odour samples (Experiment 4) were used as stimuli in the same kind of identification task. Novices were able to apply descriptors and grape names, e.g. 'Shiraz', at a level above chance (Experiment 5), but not as well as the Appropriate groups in Experiments 1-3. The procedure provides a measure of the degree to which a particular label or description is appropriate. © 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Russell, A. M. T., & Boakes, R. A. (2011). Identification of confusable odours including wines: Appropriate labels enhance performance. Food Quality and Preference, 22(3), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.11.007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free