Doing comparative research on local politics: At a crossroads between inertia and innovation

5Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article tries to build a case for more rigorous and systematic comparative research on local politics. Discussing the opportunities and obstacles often associated with this approach, it attempts to provide a state-of-the-art overview of the field. The article distinguishes between three phases: the first two can be summarised as addressing the challenge (institutionalism) and the third as theorising (with description and explanation embedded in “new” institutionalism). Each phase is illustrated by one or more cases representative of that stage of development and the underlying complexities. In addition, the article formulates some prospects for improvement within the field, specifically with regard to explanations, theories, designs, and measurement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Steyvers, K. (2019). Doing comparative research on local politics: At a crossroads between inertia and innovation. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 19(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.19.1.3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free