Towards a Contextual Definition of Rape: Consent, Coercion and Constructive Force

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper considers ‘consent-based’ and ‘coercion-based’ models of defining rape. It argues that the ability of these models to adequately protect against violations of sexual autonomy is dependent on their engagement with the broader circumstances within which sexual choices are made. Following an analysis of both models it is argued that attempts to contextualise consent and coercion are often undermined by evaluative framings that encourage scrutiny of the complainant's actions at the expense of engagement with the broader circumstances. This is particularly problematic where rape occurs as a result of non-violent coercion and the victim does not verbally or physically demonstrate their lack of consent. The paper draws on United States military law and argues that the doctrine of constructive force, which has been used to deal with non-violent coercion in these contexts, has the potential to progressively reshape our contextual and evaluative framings in domestic contexts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dowds, E. (2020). Towards a Contextual Definition of Rape: Consent, Coercion and Constructive Force. Modern Law Review, 83(1), 35–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12461

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free