Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhancement parameters between gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine in posttreatment glioma: A prospective intraindividual study

5Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Differences in molecular properties between one-molar and half-molar gadolinium-based contrast agents are thought to affect parameters obtained from dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. The aim of our study was to investigate differences in dynamic contrast-enhanced parameters between one-molar nonionic gadobutrol and half-molar ionic gadoterate meglumine in patients with posttreatment glioma. Materials and Methods: This prospective study enrolled 32 patients who underwent 2 20-minute dynamic contrast-enhanced examinations, one with gadobutrol and one with gadoterate meglumine. The model-free parameter of area under the signal intensity curve from 30 to 1100 seconds and the Tofts model-based pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated and compared intraindividually using paired t tests. Patients were further divided into progression (n = 12) and stable (n = 20) groups, which were compared using Student t tests. Results: Gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine did not show any significant differences in the area under the signal intensity curve or pharmacokinetic parameters of Ktrans, Ve, Vp, or Kep(all P >. 05). Gadobutrol showed a significantly higher mean wash-in rate (0.83 ± 0.64 versus 0.29 ± 0.63, P =. 013) and a significantly lower mean washout rate (0.001 ± 0.0001 versus 0.002 ± 0.002, P =. 02) than gadoterate meglumine. Trends toward higher area under the curve, Ktrans, Ve, Vp, wash-in, and washout rates and lower Kep were observed in the progression group in comparison with the treatment-related-change group, regardless of the contrast agent used. Conclusions: Model-free and pharmacokinetic parameters did not show any significant differences between the 2 gadoliniumbased contrast agents, except for a higher wash-in rate with gadobutrol and a higher washout rate with gadoterate meglumine, supporting the interchangeable use of gadolinium-based contrast agents for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging in patients with posttreatment glioma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, J. E., Kim, J. Y., Kim, H. S., & Shim, W. H. (2020). Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhancement parameters between gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine in posttreatment glioma: A prospective intraindividual study. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 41(11), 2041–2048. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6792

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free